JUSTICE FOR MAUREEN FAULKNER AND MUMIA ABU JAMAL

 

 ©Wendell Griffen, 2022

 

          Mumia Abu-Jamal, a Black American political activist and journalist, has been incarcerated since he was convicted in 1982 and sentenced to death for the 1981 murder of Daniel Faulkner, a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania police officer. When a federal judge overturned the 1982 death sentence in 2001 due to sentencing improprieties, Maureen Faulkner (Daniel Faulkner’s widow) and the Fraternal Order of Police were bitterly disappointed. Mumia Abu-Jamal and his supporters were disappointed that the federal judge rejected Abu-Jamal’s challenge to his conviction and ordered that he was not entitled to a new trial despite evidence that his defense counsel was ineffective, that the prosecution engaged in racial discrimination during jury selection, that the trial judge made racist comments, and that prosecutors engaged in racist tactics.

More than 40 years after Daniel Faulkner was murdered, Maureen Faulkner and Mumia Abu-Jamal continue to hold starkly conflicting views about what justice means. Faulkner realized in 2011 that her desire for Abu-Jamal to be put to death would not happen. She believes that Abu-Jamal should die in prison as a condemned murderer. Mumia Abu-Jamal’s believes that he was wrongly convicted, wrongly denied a new trial, and is now in such frail health due to congestive heart disease that he should be released from prison.

Despite their starkly differing views, Faulkner and Abu-Jamal appear to be imprisoned in a cell defined by her sorrow, fear, and relentless bloodlust, and his sorrow, fear, and relentless criticism about the racist criminal punishment system.

I view their plight through several lenses. I have experienced anger, sorrow, and desire for revenge after my relatives and friends were murdered. As a state court trial judge who has presided over murder cases, I know firsthand the anger, sorrow, and desire for revenge felt by relatives and friends of murder victims. As a pastor, I have grieved with relatives of murder victims. I also know painfully well how the criminal punishment system is corrupted by police, prosecutorial, and judicial wrongdoing and how the corrupting effect of that wrongdoing affects people like Maureen Faulkner and Mumia Abu-Jamal.

I also know another painful truth. I know that bloodlust never heals sorrow and that there is a vast difference between bloodlust, sympathy for victims of murdered persons, and justice.

As much as we respect the sorrow, anger, and bloodlust of grieving relatives, history teaches that bloodlust never heals sorrow. Bloodlust blinds, disfigures, and disables us so deeply that we become its prisoner.

 That is why judges remind jurors, crime victims, and the public that court decisions cannot be based on sympathy, prejudice, and bloodlust. No matter how much we sympathize with Maureen Faulkner and other victims of murdered persons, we never allow relatives of murdered persons to decide whether accused persons are guilty and, if so, how they should be punished.

 Justice is not served by worshipping Ms. Faulkner’s sorrow and bloodlust. Justice is also not served by excusing prosecutorial concealment of exculpatory information relevant to the issue of Abu-Jamal’s culpability for the murder of Daniel Faulkner. Although key witnesses have died and Philadelphia prosecutors, Ms. Faulkner, and her supporters prefer that Abu-Jamal die in prison, justice is not served by ignoring the prosecutorial concealment of exculpatory information out of deference to Ms. Faulkner’s bloodlust.

 Ms. Faulkner and her supporters are free to hold onto their bloodlust. That freedom does not entitle them to dictate what justice requires. 

Justice requires that Mumia Abu-Jamal be released because prosecutors concealed information relevant to his innocence from defense attorneys. Justice requires that prosecutors decide whether to attempt to prove his guilt on retrial. If prosecutors do not believe they can prove Abu-Jamal’s guilt on retrial, justice requires that he live the remainder of his life outside prison.

Justice cannot restore Daniel Faulkner’s life. Justice cannot take away Maureen Faulkner’s sorrow and bloodlust. Justice cannot restore Mumia Abu-Jamal’s years and health.

After all that has occurred, the only thing justice can do is set Maureen Faulkner and Mumia Abu-Jamal free from one another. Then, justice can only hope that somehow, they will each find a measure of peace from the torment they have suffered for so long.

 I hope a judge finds the courage, compassion, and strength to set them free.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE LAMENTABLE AND INEVITABLE ISRAELI-HAMAS WAR

  ©Wendell Griffen, 2023   Mark Wingfield of Baptist News Global has written an analysis of the current war between Israel and Hamas. I am quoted in it along with others who hold shared and different perspectives.  https://baptistnews.com/article/in-this-war-there-are-no-good-guys/ The analogy Ashlee Wiest-Laird shared in Wingfield’s piece is appropriate. Nobody should expect people whose land has been stolen, who've been locked in a room of their house, denied basic protections and civil rights, attacked at will by a stronger, US financed, stocked, and cheered military that is the fourth largest in the world, and whose 75-year plea for justice has been belittled, to decide that fighting their way out of the hellish place they have been forced into is unreasonable.  I wrote a long piece for Baptist News Global in May of this year to mark the 75th anniversary of the Palestinian Nakba (meaning "catastrophe") that provides the historical context for the war now bei
Read more

THE CRUEL DISMANTLING OF DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION (DEI) AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS

  THE CRUEL DISMANTLING OF DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION (DEI) AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS © Wendell Griffen, 2023   In an email message sent on Tuesday, June 13, Dr. Charles Robinson (Chancellor at the University of Arkansas flagship campus in Fayetteville, Arkansas) announced that staff and resources from the campus Division of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) would be reallocated to other campus offices beginning this fall. I’m posting a link to the message Chancellor Robinson sent the campus so you can read his words. https://chancellor.uark.edu/key-communications/150-forward-update-from-chancellor-robinson.php Robinson sent his message two weeks before the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided, by a 6-3 vote, that the admission policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) are racially discriminatory because both schools include racial identity among the factors considered in determining who to admit. The SCOTUS decis
Read more

IT’S TIME TO VOTE AS FREE PEOPLE

  ©Wendell Griffen, 2024 Early voting for the Arkansas primary elections begins February 20 across Arkansas, and March 5 is Election Day.   So, candidates are working hard to attract attention and influence voting decisions by voters. This essay is my effort to inform voters in Arkansas about election contests involving candidates for positions on the Arkansas Supreme Court, Arkansas Court of Appeals, circuit courts, and district judges. Because judicial candidates are the least well known of all political office contenders those of us who understand what judges do must help voters decide whether to support certain candidates over others. I have been a licensed attorney in Arkansas since 1979. I am also a retired state court judge who served on the Arkansas Court of Appeals (from 1996 through 2008) and as a Circuit Judge (from 2011 through 2022). I taught law   at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock Bowen School of Law from 2009 through 2011. I share this information so rea
Read more