MY NOVEMBER 2024 VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS
©Wendell Griffen, 2024
Early voting begins across Arkansas on Monday, October 21. I urge you to cast your vote as follows in the interest of advancing fair and more effective government.
U.S.
President KAMALA
HARRIS
U.S. Vice President TIM WALZ
U.S. Congress
1ST Congressional District RODNEY GOVENS
2nd Congressional District MARCUS
JONES
3rd Congressional District CAITLIN DRAPER
4th Congressional District RISIE
HOWARD
State Treasurer JOHN PAGAN
Chief Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court JUSTICE KAREN BAKER
Arkansas Court of Appeals (District 6) MOLLY MCNULTY
Arkansas House of Representatives
District 69 KWAMI ABDUL-BEY
District 71 CASSANDRA D. GREEN
District 75 ASHLEY HUDSON
District 78 JAMES BARTOLOMEI
District 81 GINA THOMAS-LITTLEJOHN
District 82 SAMUEL BRAZELL JR
Arkansas Senate
District 25 MICHELLE JUSTICE
Justice of the Peace, District 3 KATHY LEWISON
Justice of the Peace, District 4 JULIE BLACKWOOD
Circuit Judge (Seventeenth Division) ROBERT CORTINEZ ii
Little Rock City Director – Position 9 ANTWAN PHILLIPS
Little Rock City Director – Position 10 BLAKE TIERNEY
Annual LRSD millage tax FOR
Little Rock School District – Zone 4 TONY ROSE
Constitutional
Amendment Issue 1 FOR
· This proposed constitutional amendment would allow proceeds from the Arkansas lottery to also be used to fund scholarships and grants to Arkansans in vocational schools.
Constitutional
Amendment Issue 2 AGAINST
· This proposed constitutional
amendment would change Amendment 100, enacted in 2018, by repealing the current
authority of the Arkansas Racing Commission to issue a casino license in Pope
County and require local voter approval in a countywide election for any new
casino licenses.
Constitutional
Amendment Issue 3 FOR
· Issue 3 proposes changing two existing Arkansas laws: Article 5, Section 1 of the Arkansas Constitution, titled “Initiative and Referendum,” and Amendment 98, known as the Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment of 2016. Currently, Article 5, Section 1 of the Arkansas Constitution, “Initiative and Referendum,” allows constitutional amendments to be amended or repealed if approved by two-thirds of all members of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Issue 3 proposes adding a new subsection to Article 5, Section 1 that would prohibit legislators from changing or repealing constitutional amendments without approval from voters unless the amendment expressly allows them to do so. Issue 3 also proposes adding and removing sections of Amendment 98 – The Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment of 2016.
THE 1 CENT LITTLE ROCK SALES TAX INCREASE MEASURES
Little Rock leaders have proposed a one cent sales tax increase that has two components. Voters will have the opportunity to vote for or against each component separately. Three-eighths (3/8) of the penny would be allocated for “general operating purposes.” If enacted, this measure would be permanent. Five-eighths (5/8) of the penny increase would be allocated for “capital improvement purposes.” If enacted, that measure would sunset after ten (10) years. Mayor Frank Scott Jr. and City Directors are pushing the sales tax by calling it “Results for the Rock.” That’s a catchy title, but as the saying goes, the devil is in the details.
If enacted, the 3/8 cent measure for general operating purposes will be permanent. Little Rock leaders expect that part of the sales tax increase to produce about $244 million ($243,750,000) in additional revenue over the first ten years – averaging $24,375,000 a year.
· $10 million - $1 million
every year – increase for the Little Rock Zoo (more on that one later).
· Almost half of the
projected revenue for the first ten years of the 3/8 cent measure -
$113,000,000 (46%)– is allocated for public safety.
·
$95 million – 84% of the public safety allocation – is for
policing.
·
Passage of the 3/8 cent measure will increase spending for
policing by $9.5 million every year, PERMANENTLY. City leaders are
signaling they intend to impose “patrol and control” – PERMANENTLY – on Little
Rock residents who have complained about policing practices for decades.
The 5/8 cent measure intended for “general capital purposes” is projected to produce $650 million – two-thirds of a billion dollars – in new tax revenue for the City of Little Rock over a ten-year period.
·
City
leaders propose to allocate $10 million for “Affordable Housing” over a
ten-year period, but none of that amount annually.
·
$20
million in increased funding - $2 million a year – is proposed to address “Homelessness.”
However, personnel and fiscal issues remain concerns for the Housing Authority.
·
$249
million additional revenue is intended for “Parks and Quality of Life.” Here
are a few features listed by supporters.
o $30 million for “Zoo
Master Plan Implementation.” What plan? How? Mind you, the 3/8 cent part of the "Results for the Rock" aims to increase funding for the LR Zoo $1 million a year, permanently, on top of the $30 million for "Zoo Master Plan Implementation."
o $60 million for an “Indoor
Sports Complex” in “Downtown Little Rock.” Where? What will that mean for
downtown traffic congestion?
o $15 million for War
Memorial Park. Where is the plan?
o $10 million for a new “15
Acre Park – Downtown.” Where? And a 15-acre park downtown when downtown
residents don’t have a full-service grocery store?
o $55 million for a new “Outdoor
Sports Complex (Multi-Purpose Fields) – Southwest Little Rock (West of I-430). Where
specifically? How will it affect green space?
o $3 million for “Expansion
and Rebranding” 1st Tee Golf. How? Why?
o $10 Million for Rebsamen Golf Pro Shop and Renovations. When have city directors, let alone voters, seen the renovation plan?
Residents of Little Rock neighborhoods south of I-630 are not wealthy. They have complained for decades about food deserts, lack of affordable housing, poor drainage, and “patrol and control” police tactics. The “Results for the Rock” sales tax will require them to pay more for food they must struggle to find yet do nothing to address food deserts.
Meanwhile, the “Results for the Rock” sales tax will produce $9.5 million more "patrol and control" policing every year, no additional community mental health services, and do little to correct the shortage in affordable housing. And it will require Little Rock residents to pay almost $650 million – that’s 2/3 of $1 billion – for “capital investment” projects that have not been explained to them, let alone embraced by them.
Little
Rock Sales Tax increase
Question 1 3/8 cent for general operating purposes AGAINST
Question
2 5/8 cent for general capital purposes AGAINST
We so very much appreciate -- and use! -- your recommendations. We're also hugely grateful for Barber & Beauty Shop, and for *all* of your thoughtful, informed, immensely moral advocacy,
ReplyDeleteCould you please elaborate on your opposition to Issue 2 (casinos)? Thank you!
As always, solid, well reasoned advice.
ReplyDelete